.
Feedback

BASEBALL: Scots One Win away from CCS Berth

Carlmont bests Sequoia 2-0 to remain tied for second in PAL Bay Division; Scots can clinch spot in postseason with victory Friday or loss by Terra Nova or Hillsdale.

The Carlmont High baseball team celebrated Senior Day by scoring in each of the first two innings against Sequoia, and it was all the host Scots needed to prevail 2-0 in a Peninsula Athletic League Bay Division game on Wednesday afternoon.

The victory, along with Burlingame’s 4-3 win against Menlo-Atherton on Wednesday, leaves the Scots (17-8, 8-5 PAL Bay) in a two-way tie for second place in the Bay with Burlingame (15-11, 8-5) with one game to go. Both teams would lock up one of the league’s four automatic berths in the Central Coast Section playoffs with a win on Friday – or they could do so with a loss by either Terra Nova or Hillsdale, which are tied for fourth, one game back.

El Camino’s 13-0 win against Terra Nova (14-10-1, 7-6) ended Carlmont’s hopes of earning a share of the league title for the second straight year. El Camino secured the outright championship, its first-ever in the PAL’s top division.

If the Scots win at Sequoia (10-14-1, 4-9) on Friday, they will clinch at least a tie for second place.

Carlmont left-hander Daniel Madigan, in his final home game, picked up his seventh win of the season in amazing fashion on Wednesday. He struck out 11 as part of his fifth complete game and third shutout.

Madigan has been difficult for opponents all season. He has struck out 67 batters in 59 1/3 innings while walking only 19.

Senior catcher Colton Hicks, who has team highs with three home runs and 21 RBIs, put Carlmont on the board with a two-out RBI single in the first inning. Then a two-out single from Kyle Barret in the second drove home Gabe Belnick, who reached on an error, to give the Scots a 2-0 lead.

Bradley Levine, the probable starting pitcher on Friday, has been impressive in his own right on the mound. He has a 2.07 ERA and a team-best .189 opponent batting average.

First pitch on Friday is at 3:15 at Sequoia.

Ron May 12, 2011 at 11:01 pm
Do you really want to set up a rivalry among two teammates?
Silly.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.