.
Feedback

SMArT-e Program Sends Donations to Hurricane Sandy Victims

San Carlos School District's after school program motivates all kids to give back.

San Carlos SMArT-e students have been busy doing more than just attending music, art and sports classes. Students from this unique after school program offered at all six San Carlos School District elementary and middle schools have channeled their efforts into collecting and distributing aid to the East Coast victims of Hurricane Sandy.

According to SMArT-e Program Director Mary Carbullido, students at all of the district’s six schools collaborated their efforts and collected about 12 decorated cardboard moving boxes full of warm clothing, toys and more than 175 handcrafted letters with well wishes for the victims of the storm.

Hurricane Sandy ravaged the East Coast just before Halloween, killing more than 100 people and destroying many coastal communities, knocking out power and flooding homes in its ferocious path.

The focus on aiding Hurricane Sandy victims grew from a curriculum idea of naming the month of November the program’s season of giving, according to Carbullido.  

“We chose for November to be the season of giving so that we could really help the kids in community building,” said Carbullido. “With Hurricane Sandy happening so recently we decided to approach the subject by teaching the kids what a hurricane is and do a science focus on it.”

The science spotlight quickly moved into a human needs focus, with the kids in the program taking the lead in identifying the critical needs of the victims.

“Students called the Salvation Army to see what the victims needed. They really began to wonder what could our community do – they saw that these victims were kids like them with problems,” Carbullido said.

Once the victims’ needs were identified, the week-long donation drive was opened to students on all campuses, and many parents stepped up to donate in the form of cash and warm clothing and other child-focused items like books, art supplies, and toys.

The messages written in the kids notes ranged in content, from those simply wishing a Happy Thanksgiving to those wishing the victims were fortunate enough to have a dry place to sleep at night.

“We found the kids made it very child-focused – they recognized the kids had lost their clothes, their DS and Gameboys in the storm. This hit home with them,” Carbullido said.

In its third year on San Carlos campuses, SMArT-e, which stands for Sports, Music, Art, Technology and enrichment, is the brainchild of schools Superintendent Craig Baker, who believes in boundless learning and being able to provide an extension of learning beyond the classroom, according to Carbullido.

“Dr. Baker and I are both big proponents of hands on learning and learning through doing and we’re hoping that SMArT-e can do that,” said Carbullido.

SMArT-e partners with specialty programs in language, sports, music and technology, which in turn offer classes on the different school sites. The program offers afterschool care, combining elements like homework, outdoor play and healthy snacks with enrichment activities.

“It is a way for us to bring those types of classes to the district so that our students can take advantage of something they might never have had exposure to,” Carbullido said.

The program is flexible, allowing students to move to their enrichment classes after heading to the SMArT space or take advantage solely of the enrichment course on campus without heading to the afterschool program before hand.

The program averages about 20 kids per day at each school – about one-third of all students who use the schools’ contracted after school program, called the San Carlos Belmont Afterschool Program, which has been on all district campuses for nearly 30 years.

For more information about the San Carlos School District’s SMArT-e program or the courses it offers, please call the district at 650-508-7333.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.