.
Feedback

Holly Street Haven

Sometimes I just feel like going outside the box. This is one of those times. All about the Transit Village Project and the final EIR report.

Note: Full disclosure prompts me to reveal that I live in the Greater East San Carlos area.

The "final" revision of Enviromental Impact Report (EIR) has been submitted for study by the City of San Carlos and it is a whopper of a publication. The entire report is over 700 pages.

The first thing I noticed was the quality of the photos used to show views of the hills were inferior and do not come close to representing reality.

That being said, the report represents a fair description of the Transit Village Project, though there is definitely some difference of opinion as to what constitutes "Impact" and "No Impact."

Many issues were not adressed because they were not required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)  to certify the EIR.

San Carlos Community Development Director Al Savay, who has taken the lead on the project, addressed the city council in regards to CEQA.

He stated that while there may be continued disagreements to the Transit Village Project overall, that the council must approve or not approve the report based on CEQA requirements.

"Approving the EIR does not mean you approve the project," Savay said.

CEQA takes into consideration physical aspects of the project, not so much building codes and how it affects neighborhoods. That will, most certainly, be addressed at both the July 30 planning commission meeting and the October hearing for public comment.

There is, for example, no way I would support the closing of Old County Road for any other reason than improving the actual street itself. Definitely not for using it in constructing the project.

On the other hand, I am also aware that the Transit Village Project will go a long way to keeping San Carlos financially healthy, will provide low-cost housing and attract high scale retailers.

I certainly invite all concerned to submit their own blogs, especially representives of the Greater East San Carlos Organization, the San Mateo Country District, Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, the city of San Carlos, Legacy Partners Residental and/or West Enviromental Services and Technology, the firm that prepared the report.

I do not feel that a couple of public hearings will go far enough in coming to terms with this project and what affect it will have on the present and future population of San Carlos.

If nothing else, we owe it to ourselves to keep the city's slogan, "City of Good Living," in mind at all times.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Holly Bell May 12, 2013 at 02:59 pm
If the city council likes fake plastic nature, then let them saran-wrap their own yards! LEAVE OURRead More PARKS ALONE!! This is soccer special interest pressure on city government at its worst, and the city council appears unwilling or unable to withstand it. Crestview Park is a particularly quiet, serene, simple park with lovely views which the council now wants to turn into a sports arena. Any day you can go there and see families playing on the grass, toddlers and moms enjoying picnics and play time, kids learning to ride their bikes on the nice flat paved area, athletes and older folks enjoying the flat natural track (the only one in San Carlos) to get in shape, teens throwing frisbees on the lawn. It is a perfect place for ALL residents to enjoy according to their needs, not a sports arena dedicated to one activity at the expense of all. Belmont faced a similar lack of sports venues, but they did not choose to pave paradise. They wisely raised money and built a sports complex and spared their beautiful parks for use by ALL residents. I would like to see our city council do the right thing also. And by the way, the opposition to this short-sighted plan is far more than "some residents"! Please visit our booth at Hometown Days.
Brenda May 9, 2013 at 04:10 am
One summer my kid had soccer camp on at an artificial turf field. It was terrible. It madeRead More everything hotter and very uncomfortable. I had to pull my kid out of camp early because of it. I do not think it is better for the environment OR for kids. Just go to any turf field and try to walk across it on a hot day. Try to go barefoot on it (good luck!) We have been told not to microwave plastic containers because of BPA and bad chemicals that can cause cancer. What about heating up plastic grass and running around on it, breathing the fumes that come off it?? How is that any different?
R. W. Dehner May 9, 2013 at 02:20 am
Artificial turf is appropriate for dedicated use sports venues, not for multi-use city parks.
Gordon cook April 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Thanks for doing this. The one blatant thing I observe on a daily basis is the number and frequencyRead More of deputy's at Starbucks on 800 laurel street and the sky kitchen. I never see them in the neighborhoods. The police department was much better