.
Feedback

Transit Village Project to be Considered by Planning Commission

The Planning Commission is expected to examine the final environmental impact report (EIR) regarding Transit Village at its July 30 meeting. Public meetings on the matter are expected to be held in September.

San Carlos Community Development Director Al Savay presented a detailed report to the Planning Commission during its last meeting to discuss the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process in general, and how it might relate to the Transit Village Project.

The Planning Commission is expected to examine the final environmental impact report (EIR) regarding Transit Village at its July 30 meeting. Public meetings on the matter are expected to be held in September.


"If you approve the EIR it does not mean you will approve the project," Savay said. "The point here is to certify, not approve."

Transit Village, in the planning stages since late 2006, is being considered by the City of San Carlos to add retail space, high-end residential rental units, affordable housing units and additional parking on the land around the historic San Carlos train station.

Legacy Partners, on behalf of Sam Trans, who own the land, is the lead developer for this concept. Plans call for 280 apartments, a percentage dedicated to affordable housing, upscale retail on street level and office space on the upper two floors.

The Cal Train station (not the building) would be relocated to the south end of the property and will have 226 parking spaces, the same number which currently exists, available. This will also mean a new signal at Cherry and El Camino, which must be approved by Cal Trans.

"You are required to analyze it on the facts," Savay told the planning commission. "You may not be in agreement with it, but is it adequate based on what you know about the CEQA process?"

Neighborhood advocacy groups such as Greater East San Carlos have expressed concerns over the impact of the project in the past and have been keeping an eye on developments.

Savay acknowledged that business groups want a simpler process while environmental groups wanted stricter protections.

The final draft on Transit Village's EIR report has not been completed, though city officials are hoping to have the materials two weeks prior to July 30's study session.

For more news about San Carlos and surrounding areas, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook. Get Patched in daily - for free - by signing up for our newsletter. 

Want to blog for us? Simply click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Holly Bell May 12, 2013 at 02:59 pm
If the city council likes fake plastic nature, then let them saran-wrap their own yards! LEAVE OURRead More PARKS ALONE!! This is soccer special interest pressure on city government at its worst, and the city council appears unwilling or unable to withstand it. Crestview Park is a particularly quiet, serene, simple park with lovely views which the council now wants to turn into a sports arena. Any day you can go there and see families playing on the grass, toddlers and moms enjoying picnics and play time, kids learning to ride their bikes on the nice flat paved area, athletes and older folks enjoying the flat natural track (the only one in San Carlos) to get in shape, teens throwing frisbees on the lawn. It is a perfect place for ALL residents to enjoy according to their needs, not a sports arena dedicated to one activity at the expense of all. Belmont faced a similar lack of sports venues, but they did not choose to pave paradise. They wisely raised money and built a sports complex and spared their beautiful parks for use by ALL residents. I would like to see our city council do the right thing also. And by the way, the opposition to this short-sighted plan is far more than "some residents"! Please visit our booth at Hometown Days.
Brenda May 9, 2013 at 04:10 am
One summer my kid had soccer camp on at an artificial turf field. It was terrible. It madeRead More everything hotter and very uncomfortable. I had to pull my kid out of camp early because of it. I do not think it is better for the environment OR for kids. Just go to any turf field and try to walk across it on a hot day. Try to go barefoot on it (good luck!) We have been told not to microwave plastic containers because of BPA and bad chemicals that can cause cancer. What about heating up plastic grass and running around on it, breathing the fumes that come off it?? How is that any different?
R. W. Dehner May 9, 2013 at 02:20 am
Artificial turf is appropriate for dedicated use sports venues, not for multi-use city parks.
Gordon cook April 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Thanks for doing this. The one blatant thing I observe on a daily basis is the number and frequencyRead More of deputy's at Starbucks on 800 laurel street and the sky kitchen. I never see them in the neighborhoods. The police department was much better