.
Feedback

The Interviews: Don Eaton

Former Mayor and Councilman Don Eaton was interviewed by the city council for the position of interim city council member.

Don Eaton: I’ve lived in town for 35 years, served four terms and been the mayor three times.

Bob Grassilli:  The biggest challenge we face is the budget. Excluding that what would you say is the biggest challenege we’re facing in San Carlos over the next couple years.

DE: I’d answer it two-fold. One is to keep appropriate economic develoment going for San Carlos...Secondly, I’d answer that I think it’s very important that San Carlos maintain its sense of community. That’s something San Carlos is very unique at. All towns have a lot of good people in them, but I think we have more than our share. How we meld that is very unique and important we keep that up.

 Randy Royce: You served several terms. After being off council for a couple of years, coming back, what would you do differently as far as how you would act? Are there any things you would change, not only with all that experience, but having time to reflect?

 DE: We had a mayor’s forum the chamber took up, and I think my comment was to have the courage to do the right thing. Sometimes it is very difficult. The real challenge here is to figure out what is really best for San Carlos. But it’s having the courage to stand up and say, “Yeah, this is what I believe and this is what is best for San Carlos. Change is inevitable so let’s make it the right kind of change.

 Matt Grocott: We can do a few things here: We can do nothing and go six months with four people, we can go with a fresh face, or we can go with someone new. What would you do in our position?

 DE: I will tell you that the crtitera of hit the ground running was a major concern for all of us when this happened last time and it was spoken in the first instance because of the necessity to take on this job for a short time and be able to meld, know issues, have a background. All of those things are very important. As a council, we thought it was important to have someone who could jump right in. I’m not trying to run for election or get back into the mix. I’m here to offer some stability for six months.

 Andy Klein: If you could be king for a day, if you could do one thing, what would you do?

 DE: There a number for projects. My 1A is a kind of grandiose kind of dream and that is undergrounding all the utilities in town...its very expensive to do this but if the entire city had undergournd utilities, San Carlos would be known for that and everyones property value would go up. My 1B – my dream for the day would be that we go to work on a big-time emergency preparedness for earthquakes.  To encourage people to prepare for a big one. The earthquake in Japan recently was six minutes long. What if we get a big one? 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.