.
Feedback

San Carlos Approves Budget Following Extended Discussion

The San Carlos City Council approved $49.2 million for the fiscal year 2012-13 and $46.4 million for the fiscal year 2013-14.


Some of the numbers were shifted around and wording changed, but in the end the San Carlos City Council approved a two-year budget that decreases from $49.2 million for 2012-13 to $46.4 million for 2013-14.

What was supposed to be a formality, however, turned into an extended discussion regarding an item defined as an "unfunded liability" associated with the dissolution of South County Fire last October.


As it stands, the projected cost is zero. It could prove to be a costly expenditure though.

"These are very preliminary numbers," San Carlos Administrative Services Director Rebecca Mendenhall said. "We are trying to work with CalPERS but they are using numbers from two years ago."

The California Public Employees Retirement System, which provides retirement, health, and related financial programs and benefits to more than 1.6 million public employees, retirees, and their families, has to determine how much San Carlos will (or may not) need to contribute to the pension system.

"We have spent a great deal of time with the staff on this issue," San Carlos City Manager Jeff Maltbie said. "Their system is not designed to accommodate the dissolution of an entire entity. It seems fluid and there are several other components related to items included in the budget."

San Carlos has dealt with a series of consolidations within its organization as well as contracting out many of its services, including fire, police and dispatch. The state of California has withdrawn $25 million from the city over the past seven years.

"The history of the San Carlos City Council has been not to pass the buck," Maltbie said. "The city has endured a very long structural deficit that has been influenced by outside events, like the dot com bust and the 2008 housing crisis. We'll roll up our sleeves and figure out how to pay for it."

As for determining the possible cost of the unfunded liability, the council will address it again in six months, when the facts are clearer.

"It's like playing darts blindfolded," newly appointed City Councilwoman Karen Clapper said.

"We can only go on facts we have," Vice Mayor Bob Grassilli said. "We can come back to it mid-year."

The council did add a slight expenditure to the budget, adding an extra $15,000 for the Chamber of Commerce, which had originally seen its $90,000 budget slashed to nothing before being given $30,000.

"I was thinking of the visual impact if the funds were cut all together," Chamber of Commerce CEO David Bouchard said of losing the lights and banners that decorate Laurel Street.

Bouchard said the extra $15,000 will allow the Chamber of Commerce to continue publishing its Holiday Guide to San Carlos.

Mayor Matt Grocott recommended Clapper be named to the Library JPA and Peninsula Traffic Congestion committees, to which the council voted unanimously to accept.

 

For more news about San Carlos and surrounding areas, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook. Get Patched in daily - for free - by signing up for our newsletter. 

Want to blog for us? Simply click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Holly Bell May 12, 2013 at 02:59 pm
If the city council likes fake plastic nature, then let them saran-wrap their own yards! LEAVE OURRead More PARKS ALONE!! This is soccer special interest pressure on city government at its worst, and the city council appears unwilling or unable to withstand it. Crestview Park is a particularly quiet, serene, simple park with lovely views which the council now wants to turn into a sports arena. Any day you can go there and see families playing on the grass, toddlers and moms enjoying picnics and play time, kids learning to ride their bikes on the nice flat paved area, athletes and older folks enjoying the flat natural track (the only one in San Carlos) to get in shape, teens throwing frisbees on the lawn. It is a perfect place for ALL residents to enjoy according to their needs, not a sports arena dedicated to one activity at the expense of all. Belmont faced a similar lack of sports venues, but they did not choose to pave paradise. They wisely raised money and built a sports complex and spared their beautiful parks for use by ALL residents. I would like to see our city council do the right thing also. And by the way, the opposition to this short-sighted plan is far more than "some residents"! Please visit our booth at Hometown Days.
Brenda May 9, 2013 at 04:10 am
One summer my kid had soccer camp on at an artificial turf field. It was terrible. It madeRead More everything hotter and very uncomfortable. I had to pull my kid out of camp early because of it. I do not think it is better for the environment OR for kids. Just go to any turf field and try to walk across it on a hot day. Try to go barefoot on it (good luck!) We have been told not to microwave plastic containers because of BPA and bad chemicals that can cause cancer. What about heating up plastic grass and running around on it, breathing the fumes that come off it?? How is that any different?
R. W. Dehner May 9, 2013 at 02:20 am
Artificial turf is appropriate for dedicated use sports venues, not for multi-use city parks.
Gordon cook April 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Thanks for doing this. The one blatant thing I observe on a daily basis is the number and frequencyRead More of deputy's at Starbucks on 800 laurel street and the sky kitchen. I never see them in the neighborhoods. The police department was much better