.
Feedback

New $45.5M Pipeline to Replace Damaged, Leaky One

The pipeline runs along Bair Island and urgently needed repairs.

The South Bayside System Authority will be replacing an old sewage pipe with a new 2.5-mile pipeline starting in spring 2013.

The 18-month project comes as a necessary improvement to the old pipe built in 1971 that has a history of leakage and damage. The $45.5 million endeavor is part of the Authority’s $390 million Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to replace and upgrade aging infrastructure.

The improvements will increase the reliability of the pipe’s operation and reduce the likelihood of spills and discharges of untreated wastewater to the environment. In 2012, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave wastewater—one of eight categories rated— a C+ grade in the California Infrastructure Report Card.

“Fixing infrastructure in America is always talked about but seldom performed,” said Duane Sandul, Communications Consultant for the Authority.

“Candidates—at the state and federal level—always talk about putting people back to work by building infrastructure,” he added. “Now here’s the chance.”

The pipe portion comprises less than 25 percent of the total nine mile pipe that runs from the Menlo Park pump state to the Authority’s wastewater treatment plant, but has been involved approximately 75 percent of the past leaks. The original plant was designed for limited movement and is located almost entirely within soft bay mud that creates unstable conditions.

The leaks were always repaired before any serious ecological damage occurred, Sandul said. But particularly with the restoration of Bair Island, where the pipe will flow through, updates have become more urgent.

The Authority—which owns and operates the regional wastewater treatment at the eastern end of Redwood Shores—will install the pipe adjacent to the old one, which begins on Maple Street in the Inner Harbor—or Docktown—area and then runs underneath Redwood Creek along Inner Bair Island. It continues under Pulgas Creek and along Skyway Road, west of the San Carlos airport. The final section is within Monte Vista Drive to the San Carlos pump station.

Because the portion along Bair Island Road in Redwood City will be a microtunnel underground, there will be no road closures. However, the Authority does anticipate increased truck traffic and the parking lot will not be available between spring and fall 2013.

Because the launch point for microtunneling will occur on Maple Street in front of Docktown, through traffic to the end of Maple Street will be routed via a temporary roadway just south of the location and result in some one-way controlled traffic throughout 2013.

Part of the pipe construction on Monte Vista Drive in San Carlos will likely be narrowed to one-lane traffic. Residents will use a temporary construction traffic detour on Skyway Road in front of the Skyway Building property starting late spring 2013 until summer 2014.

The public review period for the environmental review process will occur in late summer 2012 and be completed no later than December 2012. The Authority is finalizing the design of the pipe this year.

A History of Lacking Infrastructure

The estimated investment to improve deteriorating wastewater infrastructure just in the Bay Area is $80 million per year over the next several years. The annual statewide capital expenditure for sewer systems, pump stations and wastewater treatment plants is estimated to be $4 billion per year for the next 10 years for a total of $40.5 billion.

In 2006, the California Infrastructure Report Card said $370 billion over the next 10 years was needed to bring up California’s grade to a “B”. In 2012, the 10-year total unfunded infrastructure investment required has increased to $650 billion.

The entire force main system is scheduled for repair and replacement since the entirety has demonstrated weakness over the past 30 years.

“The SBSA Commission was way ahead of the curve and took responsibility and political will to address our deteriorating facilities and infrastructure,” Sandul said. “And the city councils in Redwood City, San Carlos, and Belmont, and the directors in the West Bay Sanitary District – our owners – also demonstrated leadership by putting financial programs in place to support the improvement projects.”

To receive project updates, send your e-mail address to: sbsanews@yahoo.com For questions about the project, contact: Duane Sandul, representing SBSA, (650) 585-2181.

For more news about San Carlos and surrounding areas, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook. Get Patched in daily - for free - by signing up for our newsletter. 

Want to blog for us? Simply click here.



 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tracy Plowman April 2, 2013 at 04:16 pm
Another great Grade K- 9 San Carlos camp is Learningtech.org, rich technology includes Science,Read More Technology, Math, Digital Arts and Engineering.
Holly Bell May 12, 2013 at 02:59 pm
If the city council likes fake plastic nature, then let them saran-wrap their own yards! LEAVE OURRead More PARKS ALONE!! This is soccer special interest pressure on city government at its worst, and the city council appears unwilling or unable to withstand it. Crestview Park is a particularly quiet, serene, simple park with lovely views which the council now wants to turn into a sports arena. Any day you can go there and see families playing on the grass, toddlers and moms enjoying picnics and play time, kids learning to ride their bikes on the nice flat paved area, athletes and older folks enjoying the flat natural track (the only one in San Carlos) to get in shape, teens throwing frisbees on the lawn. It is a perfect place for ALL residents to enjoy according to their needs, not a sports arena dedicated to one activity at the expense of all. Belmont faced a similar lack of sports venues, but they did not choose to pave paradise. They wisely raised money and built a sports complex and spared their beautiful parks for use by ALL residents. I would like to see our city council do the right thing also. And by the way, the opposition to this short-sighted plan is far more than "some residents"! Please visit our booth at Hometown Days.
Brenda May 9, 2013 at 04:10 am
One summer my kid had soccer camp on at an artificial turf field. It was terrible. It madeRead More everything hotter and very uncomfortable. I had to pull my kid out of camp early because of it. I do not think it is better for the environment OR for kids. Just go to any turf field and try to walk across it on a hot day. Try to go barefoot on it (good luck!) We have been told not to microwave plastic containers because of BPA and bad chemicals that can cause cancer. What about heating up plastic grass and running around on it, breathing the fumes that come off it?? How is that any different?
R. W. Dehner May 9, 2013 at 02:20 am
Artificial turf is appropriate for dedicated use sports venues, not for multi-use city parks.
Gordon cook April 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Thanks for doing this. The one blatant thing I observe on a daily basis is the number and frequencyRead More of deputy's at Starbucks on 800 laurel street and the sky kitchen. I never see them in the neighborhoods. The police department was much better