.
Feedback

City Recommends Council Deny Carlos Club Expansion

Issue returns to council for final decision on Monday.

 

In light of opposition expressed by the Sheriff’s department, San Carlos officials are recommending that city council deny a permit to allow a proposed expansion of the .

Citing public safety concerns, San Mateo County Captain Greg Rothaus, head of the San Carlos Patrol Bureau, has the club's attempt to transition from a bar to entertainment destination that features an open air patio, live music and expanded room for seating.


And public documents made available in advance of Monday's council meeting indicate that city staff agree with Rothaus' concerns, and have adopted his position on the expansion proposal.

A report from the offices of City Manager Jeff Maltbie and Community Development Director Al Savay said that allowing the club to expand may result in San Carlos becoming a more dangerous place because club management cannot control the behavior of the increased amount of patrons once they leave the club.

To that end, Rothaus has said that in a one-year span sheriff’s deputies were called to the Carlos Club 131 times which included two DUI’s, five drunk in publics, 69 police-induced spot checks, one verbal disturbance.

"Staff is unable to assure the City Council and the community that the proposed nightclub expansion will not create a safety hazard, will not be detrimental or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public peace, health, morals, safety, comfort, general welfare or convenience," said the city report.

Should the council vote according to staff recommendation, it will fly in the face of the city's .

In his own defense, club owner Fred Duncan has opposed claims that allowing the proposed expansion will put the public in greater danger. He also said that should the expansion be approved, more security will be hired to handle the increased traffic.

But the city report focuses on the public risk that may occur once patrons leave the club, rather than what takes place on site.
, claiming that it is unfair for the city government to single out the Carlos Club as a potential problem site.

"If the owners wish to expand (especially in a back patio), I see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed," said Ilene Hruby in the Patch comment section.

While others have expressed frustration with the club and the nuisance it poses to the public.

The Carlos Club decision, and other business, will come before the San Carlos City Council at the meeting Monday night, beginning at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers.

Do you agree that allowing the Carlos Club to expand will make San Carlos a more dangerous place? Leave a comment and let us know.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tracy Plowman April 2, 2013 at 04:16 pm
Another great Grade K- 9 San Carlos camp is Learningtech.org, rich technology includes Science,Read More Technology, Math, Digital Arts and Engineering.
Holly Bell May 12, 2013 at 02:59 pm
If the city council likes fake plastic nature, then let them saran-wrap their own yards! LEAVE OURRead More PARKS ALONE!! This is soccer special interest pressure on city government at its worst, and the city council appears unwilling or unable to withstand it. Crestview Park is a particularly quiet, serene, simple park with lovely views which the council now wants to turn into a sports arena. Any day you can go there and see families playing on the grass, toddlers and moms enjoying picnics and play time, kids learning to ride their bikes on the nice flat paved area, athletes and older folks enjoying the flat natural track (the only one in San Carlos) to get in shape, teens throwing frisbees on the lawn. It is a perfect place for ALL residents to enjoy according to their needs, not a sports arena dedicated to one activity at the expense of all. Belmont faced a similar lack of sports venues, but they did not choose to pave paradise. They wisely raised money and built a sports complex and spared their beautiful parks for use by ALL residents. I would like to see our city council do the right thing also. And by the way, the opposition to this short-sighted plan is far more than "some residents"! Please visit our booth at Hometown Days.
Brenda May 9, 2013 at 04:10 am
One summer my kid had soccer camp on at an artificial turf field. It was terrible. It madeRead More everything hotter and very uncomfortable. I had to pull my kid out of camp early because of it. I do not think it is better for the environment OR for kids. Just go to any turf field and try to walk across it on a hot day. Try to go barefoot on it (good luck!) We have been told not to microwave plastic containers because of BPA and bad chemicals that can cause cancer. What about heating up plastic grass and running around on it, breathing the fumes that come off it?? How is that any different?
R. W. Dehner May 9, 2013 at 02:20 am
Artificial turf is appropriate for dedicated use sports venues, not for multi-use city parks.
Gordon cook April 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Thanks for doing this. The one blatant thing I observe on a daily basis is the number and frequencyRead More of deputy's at Starbucks on 800 laurel street and the sky kitchen. I never see them in the neighborhoods. The police department was much better