.
Feedback

Board of Supervisors Aim to Raise Sales Tax

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors are asking residents will be voting in November whether to increase sales tax by half a cent, for a period of 10 years.

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors proposed an ordinance to increase sales tax countywide by half a cent for a period of 10 years during its Tuesday meeting.

The proposal will appear on the November 6 ballot.

Proceeds from the tax, which would apply to all retail and general use transactions, would go toward increasing the County's general fund.

"The demand for essential San Mateo County services and facilities continues to exceed available resources, and while the County has made significant progress in reducing costs and in eliminating its structural deficit, without additional revenue, the County will be unable to continue providing these services and facilities," the supervisors wrote in documents supporting the proposal, which are attached in the photo section as a PDF.

The documents indicate the Board of Supervisors would "retain complete discretion regarding the use of the proceeds of the tax," saying only that the funds would be used "to raise revenues for general fund purposes."

The documents offer some theoretical examples of uses for the funds.

"The Board of Supervisors might, in the future, choose to use a portion of the revenues to assist hospitals in the County to remain open and available to County residents, including by potentially assisting Seton Medical Center to ensure the seismic safety of its facilities," the document indicates, further explaining that, if Seton does not upgrade its facilities by 2020, it will be forced to close.

If it passes election, the earliest date the increased tax can begin being collected is April 1, 2013.

The measure would take the County's base sales tax up from 8.25 percent to 8.75 percent.

The tax will apply to both incorporated and unincorporated areas of San Mateo County, with the possible exceptions of San Mateo and Half Moon Bay. 

Half Moon Bay is already proposing a half-cent sales tax of its own on the Nov. 6 ballot, meaning the two increases would take Half Moon Bay's total sales tax up to 9.25 percent.

San Mateo already has its own quarter-cent sales tax, meaning the countywide increase would take San Mateo's total sales tax up to 9.0 percent.

The Board of Supervisors says, if approved, the increased sales tax is expected to generate an additional $60 million in general use funds each year for the proposed 10 years.

To add this measure to the ballot will cost approximately $40,000.

For news about San Carlos and surrounding areas, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook. Get Patched in daily - for free - by signing up for our newsletter. 

Want to blog for us? Simply click here.


 


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Holly Bell May 12, 2013 at 02:59 pm
If the city council likes fake plastic nature, then let them saran-wrap their own yards! LEAVE OURRead More PARKS ALONE!! This is soccer special interest pressure on city government at its worst, and the city council appears unwilling or unable to withstand it. Crestview Park is a particularly quiet, serene, simple park with lovely views which the council now wants to turn into a sports arena. Any day you can go there and see families playing on the grass, toddlers and moms enjoying picnics and play time, kids learning to ride their bikes on the nice flat paved area, athletes and older folks enjoying the flat natural track (the only one in San Carlos) to get in shape, teens throwing frisbees on the lawn. It is a perfect place for ALL residents to enjoy according to their needs, not a sports arena dedicated to one activity at the expense of all. Belmont faced a similar lack of sports venues, but they did not choose to pave paradise. They wisely raised money and built a sports complex and spared their beautiful parks for use by ALL residents. I would like to see our city council do the right thing also. And by the way, the opposition to this short-sighted plan is far more than "some residents"! Please visit our booth at Hometown Days.
Brenda May 9, 2013 at 04:10 am
One summer my kid had soccer camp on at an artificial turf field. It was terrible. It madeRead More everything hotter and very uncomfortable. I had to pull my kid out of camp early because of it. I do not think it is better for the environment OR for kids. Just go to any turf field and try to walk across it on a hot day. Try to go barefoot on it (good luck!) We have been told not to microwave plastic containers because of BPA and bad chemicals that can cause cancer. What about heating up plastic grass and running around on it, breathing the fumes that come off it?? How is that any different?
R. W. Dehner May 9, 2013 at 02:20 am
Artificial turf is appropriate for dedicated use sports venues, not for multi-use city parks.
Gordon cook April 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Thanks for doing this. The one blatant thing I observe on a daily basis is the number and frequencyRead More of deputy's at Starbucks on 800 laurel street and the sky kitchen. I never see them in the neighborhoods. The police department was much better