.
Feedback

Man Dies in Parking Lot of San Carlos McDonald's

The man and his girlfriend were in a van in the parking lot when he experienced a medical emergency.

A man whose identity has not yet be released, was pronounced dead by firefighter paramedics at approximately 8:30 a.m. Wednesday in the parking lot of the restaurant located at 180 El Camino Real in San Carlos.

and paramedics responded to the scene, where the man was unconscious in the back of a gold van. According to San Carlos Deputy Fire Chief Stan Maupin, the first arriving engine company found citizens performing CPR on the man. The man's girlfriend, who has not been identified, was with him when he died.

While the investigation is ongoing, Lt. Larry Schumaker of the San Mateo County Sheriff's Department said it appeared the man died from a medical condition and foul play is not suspected.

Investigators from the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office/San Carlos Police Bureau are still gathering information about the incident according to Schumaker.

Brian Colby, manager of the McDonald's restaurant said he did not have any information on the incident and did not know how long the van had been parked in the parking lot.

On Wednesday afternoon, Tom Schramm, who identified himself as a friend of the deceased's, arrived to pick up the van, which he said belonged to the deceased man's girlfriend.

Schramm told Patch that his friend had been released from San Mateo County Jail on Tuesday, but he did not know the cause of death.

Two bags of food and two cups of coffee, presumably left by the man and his girlfriend, were in the front seat of the van when Schramm entered it. 

On the attempts of citizens to revive the man, Chief Maupin said, "Citizen involvement in early intervention with basic life support measures such as CPR and the use of an Automatic External Defibrillator (AED), when available, prior to our arrival is critical to increasing a person’s chances of survival when in cardiac arrest. We fully encourage all citizens to learn CPR in order to be able to react quickly in an event like this."

Patch will update this story as information becomes available.

Mrs G. Davis September 13, 2012 at 08:26 am
Appaprently people believe that this man was shot and killed.... is this true or is it really a medical condition? We only want to know considering San Carlos is a beautiful, quiet, HAPPY place to live- and its a hard pill to swallow to think something this tragic could happen in our "city of good living".
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) September 13, 2012 at 12:36 pm
Mrs G. Davis....according to the Sheriff's Dept., foul play was not involved.
Kristin Caldwell September 13, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Maybe it is just me, but I think all of these photos of the van (even the interior) are disrespectful.
Phillip Bailey September 13, 2012 at 09:00 pm
Joan, I sent you a private email. If the van really does belong to his girl friend, Patch should blur out the licence plate numbers. Too many kooks around that have software that can trace her residence....and ... I agree with Kristin above ...
Maria September 13, 2012 at 09:35 pm
sad
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) September 13, 2012 at 10:10 pm
Thank you for pointing that out Phillip. I have removed the photo with the visible license plate.
Kristin Caldwell September 13, 2012 at 10:58 pm
Thank you for removing the interior photo.
gigi September 14, 2012 at 12:38 pm
This gentleman was an father of two children 6 mos and 25 year old. He will be miss he was released on 9/8. Let his family and children deal with this. His friend it not either mother of his children
Phillip Bailey September 14, 2012 at 02:53 pm
gigi: your comment seems disjointed. Of course his family is going to deal with this, however since modern news media comes at people from all sides, it is quite natural for people to comment. commenting does not mean people don't care, in fact when you get a chance please READ my original comments regarding the license plate issue as well as please read Kristin Caldwell's remarks above.
Also your comment "he has been released" is a tad confusing ....did you mean "released from his journey here in earth or ?" Best Regards.
janie doe September 15, 2012 at 09:56 pm
to all of you using this story as a forum to chit chat about a tragedy that has absolutely nothing to do with you makes me sick. Read the story, mind your own business and move on to the next. The man who passed away was a friend of mine who will be dearly missed, and your comments are not welcome nor are they warranted under these circumstances.
Phillip Bailey September 15, 2012 at 10:41 pm
Janie doe; way to use your real name (gigi). Why don't you email the Patch if you have have issues or better yet, read sites like this and you will see that people who posted did zero wrong. What is your issues? Do you feel guilty concerning something?
TH5 September 17, 2012 at 03:31 pm
my guess is this was a hook up of a married man with mistress. in back of van with breakfast? oh well.
Phillip Bailey September 17, 2012 at 04:25 pm
TH511:31 said: am on Monday, September 17, 2012 my guess is this was a hook up of a married man with mistress. in back of van with breakfast? oh well.
TH5: and my guess is you're ill mentally or under the age of 26. Either way your post is inappropriate.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.