.
Feedback

GameStop Robbed at Gunpoint...Again

The GameStop video game store robbed for the second time since August.

The video store in the San Carlos Marketplace on 1135 Industrial Road was robbed at gunpoint Monday when three men ran into the store, one wielding a gun, demanded money, and escaped, police said.

The clerk immediately called police but none of the alleged robbers were found. This is the second time this has been robbed since August.

Police said they do not yet no if there is a connection between the two robberies, and the suspected robber of the August robbery was arrested and is currently in custody.

The men were described as being between 25-30 years old, but no further descriptions have yet been released.

Anyone with information is urged to call Detective Hector Acosta at 650-363-4064 or Anonymous Tip Line at 800-547-2700.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Lin January 25, 2012 at 08:21 pm
Again! We need to step up the patrols and make sure all citizens of San Carlos report any unusual activity. Keep the rift raft out of our CITY!!!!
kuuipo January 26, 2012 at 04:03 am
What time of day did this occur? Any other details besides physical descriptions available; e.g., did they escape by car or by foot, etc.?
Kali January 26, 2012 at 08:58 am
From what I have heard they were all black males ( 4 ). I have lived here a long time and the criminal element ( esp from Oakland ) is really starting to creep over here. The whole area. Sorry, but building Dollar and Ross stores, ( plus others does not help. ) You have to be alert. Everywhere.
Kenny Porpora January 26, 2012 at 04:06 pm
Thank you all for your comments! I'm curious to know...is there a reason criminals may be targeting San Carlos versus any other city of the Peninsula?
Kenny,
It's not San Carlos as much as it is the San Carlos Marketplace. According to the police, San Carlos Marketplace is a very attractive location for armed robberies and vehicle break-ins because of the proximity to 101. The police say that once the crooks hit 101, they're in the City in about 20 minutes. Whatever they've stolen (cars, laptops,electronics,etc...) literally disappears into the San Francisco minutes after they get it up there. So any business that's located close to a freeway onramp should always exercise extra caution.
Kali January 27, 2012 at 09:00 am
Kenny, that is a good question. I would like to see the crime rate of the Big Box area down near Palo Alto where they have similar stores.
@ The Square: I think you are right to a degree, but it is not just that area. As other articles being posted, it is happening inland too. There have robberies on Laurel Street. Ahter thinking alitle more, Redwood City is turning into crime area. I remember going into the Seq Station even a early as 5-6 years ago and it was a nice place to go. You go there now, and it's flooded punks, kids from that High School across the street that are not the nicest crowd of people. They even have guards there, so it may be coming from there too. I know if it continues, my husband and I will move. San Carlos is so nice, but if the crime continues, we will leave. We did not pay a pretty penney for house in a town of 26K to have this type of crime. My sister lives in Pleasaton and they don't have the crime rate we do and their Population is over 70K, and they do have lots of big box stores along the freeway.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.