.
Feedback

Drunk Party Crasher Fires Shotgun at Houseguests

Alleged gang member Ismael Garcia Luna was arrested in Redwood City early this morning for shooting into an inhabited dwelling and six counts of attempted murder.

At around 1 a.m. Saturday morning, 20-year-old Ismael Garcia Luna crashed a party in the 500 block of Hurlingame Avenue in the North Fair Oaks area of Redwood City, according to the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office.

He was unknown to any of the guests, intoxicated and asked to leave.

Not wishing to take no for an answer, the party crasher punched the resident in the face, according to police. Several of the party guests came to the aid of their host and physically removed the party crasher from the premises.

The angered party crasher left after allegedly yelling some gang remarks and threatening people at the party.

Approximately 40 minutes later, at least one shot was fired through a window of the same house, said police officials. The shot shattered the glass, which flew into the faces of several women inside the house.

The injured victims were treated by EMS personnel at the scene. No victims were transported to the hospital.

Sheriff’s Deputies obtained a description of Garcia and searched the area for the possible suspect.

Approximately one hour later, a person matching Garcia’s description was located hiding in the area of Halsey & Macarthur, which is about three blocks away from the crime scene.

The suspect was identified as Garcia and identified by witnesses as the person who had earlier tried to crash the party and assault the victim.

A shotgun and other evidence were located near where Garcia was located.

Garcia was arrested and booked into the Maguire Correctional Facility for shooting into an inhabited dwelling and for six counts of attempted murder. He does have an arrest history for theft, drug and assault offenses and currently resides in San Jose, however is believed to have previously lived in Redwood City.

He is believed to be a current or former gang member however the victims in this case are not at all associated with a gang.

Any person who may have witnessed this incident or has information about this suspect, is asked to contact detective Hector Acosta at 650-363-4064 or via email at hacosta@smcgov.org or the Sheriff’s Office Anonymous Witness Line at 800-547-2700.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Aaron September 1, 2012 at 09:21 pm
inb4 a bunch of uninformed people start talking about how badly we need a new jail.
Jim C September 1, 2012 at 11:00 pm
If there is any question as to whether Mr. Luna will spend the bulk off is remaining life behind bars, I think we need a new jail...badly.
The1 September 17, 2012 at 09:52 pm
College students having a party in the middle of lil Mexico at morning hours, and they expect the party not to be crashed by local inhabitants. They should have had the police remove this party crasher instead of battering him and getting him angrier gang member + easy access to guns + not being in the right state of mind (drunk) could have been a disaster. Let this be a leason for all as to this young man life in prison I don't think so he's to young and the circumstances don't call for that a few years in prison that seems more logical, and as for these outta control college parties learn to cordially treat all people and if not let the police escort them out.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.