.
Feedback

Back To School

School Board Member Seth Rosenblatt talks about the past, present, and future of San Carlos Schools.

Welcome to the inaugural On Education column in San Carlos Patch!

In these pages, I will venture to keep San Carlans informed on education news and issues facing our community.  It's an interesting time in education, and public schools are under more financial stress than ever.  However, San Carlos has a history of producing excellent schools despite its limited resources. 

Kids arrived back in classes a few weeks ago, and the schools are in full swing.  In fact, the San Carlos public schools have more students than ever!  The seven schools currently have almost 3,200 students enrolled, 130 more than last year. 

There are a number of issues facing the local public schools this year.  Due to a number years of increased enrollment, one of the biggest topics will be capacity planning.  If current trends continue, it will be more difficult for many schools to provide quality space for all students (local realtors report that more and more young families continue to move to San Carlos because of the reputation of the schools).  At the School Board meeting last Thursday night, the Board directed the Superintendent to inform parents of current 4th grade students who live outside of the school district boundaries that they will not be able to get into one of the two middle schools next year.  However the Board agreed that it needed to discuss both short-term and long-term strategies to increase capacity across the district.

Another big topic for the year will be finances.  The State of California has not yet passed a budget for the current fiscal year, and there continues to be concerns among education leaders that school budgets may be cut further.  Yet there is potential good news in that California should soon release funds to local schools from the Federal Education Jobs law – this should provide around $550,000 to the San Carlos public schools.  However, this is a one-time grant, and there still remains the risk that the state may reduce the education budget by an offsetting amount.  If funds are received, they must be spent to directly support classroom education.  Given that it is impractical to expect lowering of class sizes in the middle of the year, it's likely that we'll see the San Carlos School District use that money to reduce cuts made earlier to employee compensation and programs.

The beginning of the school year brings more good financial news.  The San Carlos Education Foundation reached its last year's fundraising goal of $1.7 million, and the district has been successful in launching its SMART-E program of summer camps and afterschool programs, bringing in additional revenue streams.

The other big financial event of the school year will most certainly be the potential ballot measure to renew the Measure D parcel tax.  Passed by the voters in 2003, the measure raises over $1 million per year for the school district.  Measure D expires in 2011, and a citizens' committee has already formed to work on a campaign for its renewal this Spring if and when the School Board places such a measure on the ballot.

Other new initiatives announced by the school district at the start of the school year include a new communication system with parents and a new wellness program courtesy of a grant from the Sequoia Healthcare District.

The School Board is set to finalize the yearly goals for the Board and the Superintendent at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The School Board meets normally on the 2nd and 4th Thursday of each month, and the next meeting will be on Thursday, Sept. 23 at  7 pm at the Central Middle School Library. 

If you have any questions, comments, or suggested topics for future columns, feel free to e-mail me at seth@rosenblatt.org.  In future columns, I will publish some frequently asked questions and answers.

=====

Seth Rosenblatt is a member of the San Carlos School Board, elected in 2007.  He also serves on the Board of the San Mateo County School Boards Association and has his own consulting business with clients in technology and media.

=====

Want to know more about your child's education? Let Seth know your comments below!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jessika Welcome September 14, 2010 at 12:10 pm
"The seven schools currently have almost 3,200 students enrolled, 130 more than last year."
With so many kids in the elementary system, and with so many families moving to the city for the schools, isn't a rebuilt San Carlos High School in some way inevitable?
Seth Rosenblatt September 14, 2010 at 12:35 pm
Unfortunately not. First of all, it's important to note that the high schools are run by a separate school district, the Sequoia Union High School District and not the San Carlos School District. The SUHSD runs from Woodside to Belmont and is having some of the same enrollment and capacity issues, partly due to the growth in places like San Carlos (as well as Redwood Shores and other areas). I don't know of any plans from the SUHSD to build an additional school, and of course they would need the land to do that in any case. There's not much space available in San Carlos, so I suspect that if they did add capacity in the coming years, it wouldn't be here.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.