.
Feedback

“Can Santa Read?”

Amidst the holiday pressure, my biggest stress is sticking to the list

We’re in it! The holiday hustle and bustle is upon us. A short drive through the main streets of Belmont and San Carlos and all you see is lights -- festive lights that were put up on most homes and lawns over Thanksgiving weekend -- an early start to a crazy season. It’s a beautiful display of Christmas joy threaded with the torrid reminder of all the shopping that needs to be done…

My kids began their coveted Christmas lists the day after Halloween. There were a few ghosts and ghouls that made their lists in keeping with that season, but as the weeks have gone on, they have shortened, cropped and edited their lists to include only the “must haves.” Thanks to numerous toy catalogues and commercials, my kids have thick wish lists. They know what’s being offered and what they hope to acquire. What they haven’t conceptualized is the cost of it all.

But I am trying to do it differently this year. In looking at the magnitude of random toys and leftover or missing pieces dumped at the bottom of toy bins and drawers around my house, this year I have decided to go for three nice gifts for each child and then a bountiful of good stocking stuffers.

I started shopping earlier this year than I do normally. I woke up early on Black Friday and hit Amazon hard. I got some pretty sweet deals on the exact items the kids have their sights on this year. And I have verbalized the “top three items” jargon quite a bit.

But I have to say, I am a bit nervous. When Connor was 4, he accused Santa of being illiterate.

Connor couldn’t read or write then, but he spent hours crafting a lengthy list created from cut out catalogue toy pictures with their written descriptions. So to the best of my elf-like abilities I hit Toys ‘R’ Us and found a few things I believed at that time he’d like more. The items were similar to those items on his list but I added a few additional things that looked cool to me. Big no-no.

But what was I to do? His list was the back and front pages of five 8 1/2 by 11-sized pieces of red and green construction paper taped together in a scroll, mirroring Santa’s Naughty/ Nice list. Each page had at least eight different items, some with their exact description and others with totally random wording. With at nearly 80 items, it was confusing to say the least.

But apparently there was total order for Connor. He knew which ones topped the list and which ones he could live without. And in keeping with the idea that Santa magically knows which child has been naughty and nice at every point of every day throughout the year, Connor thought that if Santa didn’t have his list memorized, he would at least have his homemade list for reference. After all, Santa is magic.

Magic and stupid, apparently.

Come Christmas morning when the presents were ripped open and toys strewn about, Connor asked me and my husband if Santa could read.

“Does Santa know how to read, Mommy?”

“Of course he does,” I said, not knowing where he was going with this question. (Connor was very grateful for the toys he received, but wondered why the ones he spent so much time choosing were nowhere in sight).

“Well, then why didn’t I get the things on my list?”

We were silenced without an answer. We took the whole elf and workshop route –

“Maybe Santa’s elves couldn’t make that toy?” And for the first time we were very happy that our oldest son has a birthday three weeks after Christmas.

“Maybe your going to get some of those toys for your birthday and Santa knew that…” (Back to the magic!)

So this year, I’m feeling good. The list is written in Connor’s own writing and I softly nudged his desires to include three top items I knew I could provide. But that’s not to say that once the list was written, I put it in a safe spot just in case it’s needed for proof later. I have also downplayed the whole Christmas wish list, immediately recycling toy catalogues and fast-forwarding toy commercials.

Santa’s been studying.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.