.
Feedback

A Parenting Pain: Follow Through

Consequences for children hold so much weight, even though they’re hard to face

I remember when I was a cub mom – just had one child and one on the way – and spent several “mom’s nights out” attending parenting lectures on how to do better at my newfound career.

One topic came up quite a bit, indicating that it was a subject that held its ground no matter what parenting trend would rise and fall. It’s crucial existence was to be acknowledged in every child-discipline situation. The subject was, fittingly so, consistency and follow through.

I have always tried to follow through with my initial threats. And I say threat, because that’s my final straw, my last laugh, my last hurrah. I threaten. I say that if you do that again, you can’t have dessert, you can’t watch TV, you can’t go on the play date, you can’t … you can’t … you can’t. It’s almost as common as the word no, much to the chagrin of parenting experts everywhere.

But alas, with three kids young in age and moving as a cluster through the perils of life, I have to liken my crew to a team, a squad, one working organism that deals with the negotiations, compromises, yeses and no’s… and of course, threats.

For the most part, I hold a pretty high score for following through with my threats (and promises, too.)

But one comment the other night reminded me that summer might be seeing a softer side of things… and it’s got to stop!

One of my children made fun of the other during bedtime story time and all hell broke loose. Given that it was nearing 9 p.m. (lights out are closer to 8:30 in our house), I chose to tell the antagonizer that “we would talk about this in the morning.” I said this in my most stern mom voice, using a furrowed brow, right tilt of the head and guilt-producing eyes.

The response I received under his breath was startling to say the least.

“You won’t remember…” his adorable voice trailing in the quiet room. His eyes grew large and his face went flush when he saw that I had heard what he said.

Wow! Where did that come from, I thought.

I felt as though I was back in college, receiving a C, a grade I commonly received in every philosophy class I took even though I tried harder in that subject than any other.

But hearing that my oldest son, my test kitten, my work in progress, doesn’t think I will follow through puts me in a weird state. Do I come on stronger, discipline less or more effectively, stop with the threats, make the punishment more severe, abolish time outs and punishments all together and just move to some swanky Buddhist Temple where we live as minimalists? OK, a bit far fetched… but that’s the doozy a nonchalant comment like that one will impress on my (clearly) non-philosophical mind.

Ah, follow through. Luckily, at my children’s preschool we have a wise director whose lectures on follow through I have listened to intently. I have come across the notes I scribbled during her lectures, some have doodles of snails and flowers, the only real art I can produce, but they have the only phrase I must engrain in my mind over and over and over again.

“Mean what you say and say what you mean.”

Follow through sends the message to a child that you are paying attention and that you mean business. In a strange manner (I say this because my kids get so mad when I take away a privilege or punish them), the follow through and consequence portion of parenting ultimately shows our kids how much we love and respect them by teaching them that life is simply easier when you follow the rules.

It must have been those college memories of Descartes and Kant and Existential Phenomenology that made me do this, but I littered my house that night with Post-it’s.

“Follow Through” (with a cute snail) on the phone.

“Follow Through” (with a cute flower) on the coffee pot.

“Follow Through” (I tried a cute sun, but decided in the future I will stick with snails and flowers) on my sunglasses.

When Connor woke up the next morning, I was pacing the house, with a cup of piping hot coffee, my phone in my pocket and for some odd reason, my sunglasses holding back my hair even though it was overcast and I was still in PJs.

“Good morning, Connor, we have to talk,” I said sternly.

“Hi Mommy, about what?” he said. (I was tempted to say HA! You forgot! But I am the adult.)

“I want to talk with you about what happened last night just before we finished reading our books…” We had a nice discussion and I believe he understood how his behavior impacted our evening. He even came up with some alternatives that might have been better suited for him in that situation.

Thereafter, I removed my unnecessary sunglasses, put my phone down and sat down next to him while he ate his breakfast.

Point for Mom, and thank God for Post-its.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.