.
Feedback

Just How Bad is the Bay Area Commute?

A new study says the San Francisco commute is one of the worst in the nation; the Silicon Valley isn't much better.

Commuters know Bay Area highways morph into glorified parking lots in the morning and evening, on holidays and weekends, and pretty much any time you actually need to be some place on time. 

Now a new study has the data to back up the brake lights.

San Francisco-Oakland ranked No. 2 of the 101 cities in 2011 data for the amount of extra hours of travel due to congestion for the average auto commuter. San Jose was in the top third at 28th, according to the Urban Mobility Study released this month.

The report, produced by the Texas Transportation Institute, rates worst areas for traffic congestion in the United States. Washington, D.C., was named the most-congested for the fourth year in a row.

Peak-hour commuters spend 89 hours waiting in San Francisco-Oakland traffic and burn 37 extra gallons of fuel each year. They lose 39 hours stuck in traffic annually in San Jose and use 17 extra gallons of gas, the study showed.

For the first time, the report includes a Planning Time Index (PTI), which measures the amount of extra time drivers need to arrive on time for events such as appointments, airplane departures or cargo shipments.

A routine 20-minute trip in San Jose will take 69 minutes during peak commute times and nearly 75 minutes in San Francisco or Oakland, according to the PTI calculations.

“We all understand that trips take longer in rush hour, but for really important appointments, we have to allow increasingly more time to ensure an on-time arrival,” researcher Bill Eisele told the Miami Herald. “As bad as traffic jams are, it’s even more frustrating that you can’t depend on traffic jams being consistent from day to day.”

The upshot? Well, San Francisco isn't really getting worse. The city has been rated among the top-three worst commutes in the nation for the past decade. San Jose has improved substantially since 6th and 8th place ratings a few years ago.

Do you think Highway 1 and Highway 92 to interstates 101 and 280 have gotten more congested? Where do you commute to and how do you ease your commute? Tell us in the comment section below.

Also on Patch:

  • Is There Really a Baby Grand Piano Sitting on a Bluff in Half Moon Bay?
  • Two Killed in Crash Near Pescadero
  • Victims of Monday's Deadly Crash Identified
  • Obituary: Robin Woodall Hutto of San Carlos
  • Update: Nor'Easter Cancels Dozens SFO Flights

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!


Don’t be left out of the conversation taking place in San Carlos--Sign up for our daily newsletter | Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter| Start a blog

Don’t be left out of the conversation taking place in Belmont--Sign up for our daily newsletter|Like Belmont|Patch on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Start your own blog

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Holly Bell May 12, 2013 at 02:59 pm
If the city council likes fake plastic nature, then let them saran-wrap their own yards! LEAVE OURRead More PARKS ALONE!! This is soccer special interest pressure on city government at its worst, and the city council appears unwilling or unable to withstand it. Crestview Park is a particularly quiet, serene, simple park with lovely views which the council now wants to turn into a sports arena. Any day you can go there and see families playing on the grass, toddlers and moms enjoying picnics and play time, kids learning to ride their bikes on the nice flat paved area, athletes and older folks enjoying the flat natural track (the only one in San Carlos) to get in shape, teens throwing frisbees on the lawn. It is a perfect place for ALL residents to enjoy according to their needs, not a sports arena dedicated to one activity at the expense of all. Belmont faced a similar lack of sports venues, but they did not choose to pave paradise. They wisely raised money and built a sports complex and spared their beautiful parks for use by ALL residents. I would like to see our city council do the right thing also. And by the way, the opposition to this short-sighted plan is far more than "some residents"! Please visit our booth at Hometown Days.
Brenda May 9, 2013 at 04:10 am
One summer my kid had soccer camp on at an artificial turf field. It was terrible. It madeRead More everything hotter and very uncomfortable. I had to pull my kid out of camp early because of it. I do not think it is better for the environment OR for kids. Just go to any turf field and try to walk across it on a hot day. Try to go barefoot on it (good luck!) We have been told not to microwave plastic containers because of BPA and bad chemicals that can cause cancer. What about heating up plastic grass and running around on it, breathing the fumes that come off it?? How is that any different?
R. W. Dehner May 9, 2013 at 02:20 am
Artificial turf is appropriate for dedicated use sports venues, not for multi-use city parks.
Gordon cook April 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Thanks for doing this. The one blatant thing I observe on a daily basis is the number and frequencyRead More of deputy's at Starbucks on 800 laurel street and the sky kitchen. I never see them in the neighborhoods. The police department was much better