.
Feedback

Bay Area Residents Lace Up to Run Off Lung Cancer

Jill’s Legacy run aims at heightening awareness for No. 1 cancer killer. It was formed as an advisory board to the Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation in San Carlos, the worldwide leader in eradicating the disease.

At 22 years old, Jillian Costello’s goals were a little different than most young women her age. While most of her peers were celebrating college graduation and the commencement their adult lives, Costello was preparing for the end of hers.

A UC Berkeley graduate, student athlete and a non-smoking lung cancer victim, Costello from San Francisco, was diagnosed with lung cancer in June 2009 and died just one year later.

Her unrelenting fight made her a poster child for how the disease can affect even the healthiest people, shattering the stigma that this disease – the number one cancer killer – is brought on by smoking.

Fact is, 80 percent of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients either never smoked or quit smoking decades ago, according to Bonnie Addario, namesake and founder of the Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation in San Carlos, the worldwide leader in eradicating the disease. Lung cancer, Addario said, accounts for more than 30 percent of all cancer deaths.

To embrace Costello’s memory, Jill’s Legacy was formed, an advisory board to the Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation, made up of young professionals who have been personally touched by lung cancer.

According to one advisory board member, their mission is simple. “Essentially, we want to make a change in the way lung cancer is viewed in society and treated in medicine,” said Jill’s Legacy Executive Committee member Kristina Renda. “While other cancers have benefited from modern science and research and exceeded survival rates of 95 percent, the survival rate for lung cancer hasn’t budged from 15 percent in 40 years. That is unacceptable to us and that’s something we have to change.”

On March 10, throngs of supporters are expected to lace up their sneakers and run in honor of Costello and of the foundation as a whole, getting the message out about how under-funded the world’s No. 1 cancer killer is and how its stagnant 15 percent survival rate is simply put: intolerable.

“I am inspired and extremely hopeful about the message these incredible young people can send to the world about lung cancer,” Addario said. “They can unearth the truth about this horrific disease, of epidemic proportions and substantially impact funding for much-needed research.”

The start of the run begins at Kroeber Fountain on the University of California, Berkeley campus at 11 a.m.

More information about Jill’s Legacy can be found at http://jillslegacy.org/ or at www.lungcancerfoundation.org.

 

Read more on San Carlos and Belmont Patch:

  • Women of Aviation Week Hits Cruising Altitude
  • In The Kitchen With Chef Roland Passo
  • Dine and Dash Suspect Pleads Not Guilty
  • Know of a Business in Town Opening or Closing?
  • Shoreway Environmental Center Celebrates Recycling Milestone
  • Citizens Raise Concerns About Ralston Avenue Safety

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Ronica Smucker March 7, 2013 at 05:19 pm
It is also important to note that non-smoker lung cancer is largely a women's disease and there are significant increases of it recently.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.