.
Feedback

BART to Run Until 3am on New Year's Eve

BART said it will utilize a "skip-stop" train pattern into and out of San Francisco.

 

By Bay City News Service

People in the Bay Area who don't want to drive on New Year's Eve can travel on BART until 3 a.m., transit officials said.

BART normally operates until midnight, but the transit agency said it is extending its hours on New Year's Eve to help people get home from their festivities.

BART officials said they also will have about 100 employees in yellow vests standing by at station entrances and platforms to help direct passengers to the appropriate stations.

The agency said extra station agents will be on hand at downtown stations to help customers and BART police, train technicians, ticket machine technicians, emergency medical technicians, system service workers, and elevator and escalator repair technicians will be strategically placed to help respond to problems.

In addition, deputies from the sheriff's departments in San Francisco and Alameda counties will supplement BART police, BART officials said.

The agency said it will run additional trains into and out of San Francisco on New Year's Eve in addition to the normal weekday evening service, which calls for trains every 20 minutes.

BART said the extra service is designed to ease the crowding at the Embarcadero and Montgomery Street stations that results from the large number of people expected to attend the fireworks show in downtown San Francisco.

To further ease crowding at these stations, beginning at 8 p.m., BART said it will utilize a "skip-stop" train pattern into and out of San Francisco just as it has in past years.

The pattern calls for trains on the Pittsburg/Bay Point and Richmond lines heading into San Francisco not to stop at the Embarcadero station.

The San Francisco stop closest to the fireworks show for customers on the Pittsburg/Bay Point and Richmond lines will be Montgomery Street.

Trains on the Dublin/Pleasanton and Fremont lines will stop at the Embarcadero station but not at Montgomery Street.

Trains from Millbrae and Daly City will make all stops in San Francisco.

BART said that after the fireworks end, passengers boarding trains bound for Pittsburg/Bay Point and Richmond must use the Montgomery Street station.

Trains on the Pittsburg/Bay Point and Richmond lines will not stop at the Embarcadero station on their way out of San Francisco.

Passengers boarding trains on the Dublin/ Pleasanton and Fremont lines must use the Embarcadero station, as trains heading to Dublin/Pleasanton and Fremont will not stop at the Montgomery Street station.

Millbrae and Daly City-bound trains will make all stops, but BART recommends passengers on those lines use the Montgomery Street station.

BART said additional event trains will be standing by to carry riders home during the busiest time when the fireworks end.

On New Year's Day, BART will operate on a holiday/Sunday timetable with service beginning at 8 a.m. 

Copyright © 2012 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob Winters June 18, 2013 at 08:51 am
Best of luck finding good homes, we already have two cats. You may want to consider this advertisingRead More technique: http://i41.tinypic.com/2s17tk0.jpg
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.