.
Feedback

And The Winner Is...

Click to find out who won the San Carlos Cutest Couple Contest!

It was a hard fought contest that came down to the final minutes. I sat and refreshed my computer browser and watched in awe as the numbers of comments climbed higher and higher.

In the end, it was Billy & Maria who won the San Carlos Cutest Couple Contest with 55 votes, inching out Jim & Debbie by one vote, and Dan and Kris by four votes!

Just after 9 p.m., Dan Robinson informed me of a computer glitch that interfered with his couple receiving comments. In a desperate attempt to maintain fairness to the exciting competition, I thought to postpone the contest.

But this isn’t about winning! This is about love! And Billy and Maria gave an amazing showing by racking up so many votes given they had one less day than their counterparts.

Jim and Debbie were the first to take the contest to the next level. They raised the bar and kept it there for the competitions duration.

And Dan and Kris may have won the whole thing if not for a last minute system error.

Thank you also to Zak and Jessica and Ed and Joyce, both of whom are beautiful couples in their own right with so much love and support, as shown in their comments.

On behalf on San Carlos Patch, THANK YOU for your hard work and participation in this great contest! This has been so much fun.

I sincerely apologize for the last minute confusion. But as they say…glitch happens.

Today is about love. And you’re all really beautiful couples. I hope you have a wonderful day.

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Carlos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Thomas February 14, 2012 at 12:24 pm
That was fun! Great idea.
Kris Robinson February 14, 2012 at 02:03 pm
Kenny, you are absolutely right! It IS about love and it is great to know that love like this is alive and well in San Carlos.
Congratulations to Billy and Maria and to all of the couples who participated. I hope that you all have a fantastic day and that you carry this feeling on throughout the year. We will raise a glass to you all at dinner tonight.
WIlliam Barry February 14, 2012 at 08:56 pm
Thank-you to all of our beautiful friends for supporting us. You all are a blessing to our lives. It was good fun and great to read about all the love and affection people had for each of the couples. I am blessed to have such a beautiful, intelligent, kind-hearted, and fun loving partner. Maria brings a smile to my face each morning and motivates me to be a more life-affirming and better person. Thank you Kris for you comments and have a great day everybody!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Marl Olbert said this right after refusing to second Matt Grocott's motion for 2 week delay of vote.Read More I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary. both in terms of compensation and provision I think part because he has never been a city manager before. and he had to prove himself. you can make a argument that that wasn't fair. if you think the person is capable for doing the job not necessarily the fact that they don't have the experience. it happens all over the place it happened to me personally it's just a part of the accepted process but another part of the accepted process is that if the person proves themselves you have to keep faith with them and if you don't you're actually sending a message You're saying that you can't trust us and i totally think that Mr. Maltbie is worth the pay, but besides that i think it is a issue of integrity and maintaining the integrity of the negotiation process and the hiring process that's why I'm going to vote yes for it.
Michael G. Stogner June 15, 2013 at 05:08 pm
I would like to know who those various people were who gave Mark Olbert that understanding.
Michael G. Stogner June 17, 2013 at 04:54 pm
Council member Mark Olbert one who refused to second Mr. Grocott's motion made an interestingRead More statement. "I wasn't here at the time but i talked to various people who were. It's my understanding that when Mr. Maltbie was hired into this position he was offered a significantly below market salary." I know for a fact that he didn't talk to Matt Grocott who was there. That leaves 3 potentials, 2 of them are deceased and the 3rd was Andy Klein who did not attend that meeting so he didn't vote. I would like to know who the "various people who were" are.
Marc Parent June 11, 2013 at 07:50 am
San Carlos just spent 10 Million after lawsuit from the "Bay Keepers", more activistsRead More wanting more money?
Holly Bell June 8, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Unbelievable!! Many voters are watching this issue closely and will remember this vote. Evidently,Read More these commissioners believe that resident's have no voice in city decision-making. Someone please name those commissioners who disregarded the loud-and-clear preference of the people. Time to clean house.
Bob Farkas June 8, 2013 at 02:01 pm
The two commissioners who voted for turf were John Seiling and Ray Merala. It was Ray's lastRead More meeting as a commissioner since he has termed out after 9+ years of service. I think they felt that the needs of the elite CYSO program should take precedence over neighbors and others who use the park. Youth sports seems a principal influencer at Parks and Rec. as they are the largest organized user of the facilities. I agree with many other opponents of this project that we all need to support adequate fields for youth sports. I just think these needs have to be in balance with those of the rest of the community. It was very disappointing that, although it is field availability which is purportedly driving this initiative, there was no available recent data to demonstrate the problem or an analysis of how much of the problem would be addressed by this measure. To a businessman like me, this seems a very unprofessional approach.
Concerned Taxpayer June 8, 2013 at 07:08 pm
This is purely a NIMBY issue. Lets just all be honest about that. The folks who live across fromRead More Highlands Park were the loudest opponents there and were citing all kinds of crazy issues when they should have just been honest and said,"I really don't want to look at more people and cars at the public park that is across the street from me and was there when I moved in." That is essentially the true gripe. NIMBY!!! A very weak argument and unelectable dishonest. Unless you can create more land we have to extend the use at existing parks and fields. This is very logical. We live in California and having to use astro turf stinks but we also live where there is no more available land to utilize. The commissions punted this to the council pure and simple. Well we already know who will vote against it. I am curious who will vote for it?????
Bill June 5, 2013 at 02:53 pm
This post makes zero sense. Bike lanes are a visual reminder to drivers that they must share theRead More road with riders. For every cyclist who is not observing the rules of traffic, I will show you 100 texting drivers. Removing bike lanes is not the answer.